Comparatively speaking…

Published On 25/02/2014 | By Peta Stevenson | Consumer protection

Over on our sister blog IP Whiteboard, Anthony Duong has reported on the recent Federal Court decision in Telstra v Optus, in which Telstra succeeding in establishing that Optus’ TV campaign was misleading and deceptive under the Australian Consumer Law, on the basis that it misrepresented the geographical coverage of Optus’ mobile network and the comparative coverage of
the two networks.

Read the full post here, and other great IP related topics at

Photo credit: eflon / Foter / CC BY

About The Author

is a partner in the Sydney office of King & Wood Mallesons where she specialises in competition litigation with experience in a wide range of jurisdictions. Peta also advises clients on the application of the anti-competitive conduct, consumer protection and access provisions of the Competition & Consumer Act 2010 (Cth) and related state legislation. In 2001/02 she undertook her LLM at the University of Cambridge, during which time she developed a passionate if fleeting interest in rowing.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

17 + 9 =